Publication Ethics
The Journal of Human Resource Management and Knowledge Advancement is committed to upholding the highest standards of ethics in academic publishing. As a member of the academic community, we adhere to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and strive to maintain the integrity of the publication process.
Publication Ethics
The journal is dedicated to ensuring the quality and integrity of the published content. We expect all authors, reviewers, and editors to comply with the ethical standards outlined below:
- Authors must ensure that their work is original and does not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others.
- Authors must not engage in plagiarism, falsification, or fabrication of data.
- Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and ensure that their work is free from bias.
- Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript and provide constructive feedback to the authors.
- Editors must ensure that the publication process is fair, unbiased, and transparent.
Peer Review Process
The journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of the published content. The identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential to prevent bias and ensure an objective evaluation of the manuscript.
Licensing and Copyright
The journal is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license, which allows for the free distribution and reuse of the published content, provided that the original author and source are properly cited.
Plagiarism and Retraction Policy
The journal takes plagiarism seriously and uses plagiarism detection tools to identify instances of academic dishonesty. In cases where plagiarism is detected, the journal reserves the right to retract the published article and take further action as necessary.
Complaints and Appeals
The journal has a clear complaints and appeals procedure in place to address any concerns or disputes that may arise during the publication process. Authors, reviewers, and readers can submit their complaints or appeals to the editorial office, which will be addressed in a fair and transparent manner.